Why is knowledge of literary theory important for teachers in their Essay

Why is knowledge of literary theory important for teachers in their role of helping children to develop as readers - Essay Example Literacy theory provides a teacher many tools to enhance the students reading experience such as reading aloud, comprehension workshops and clubs which can substantially contribute to enhancing abilities. Literacy theory allows the teacher to experiment with greater confidence than otherwise, thereby providing a fresh impetus to knowledge. The expanded vision of the teacher develops more self-assurance and generates ability to reason for following a particular form of teaching thereby meeting the curiosity of the modern student. This will greatly enhance the value derived from reading by the students. Literacy theory also enables a teacher to take on the role of a mentor, supporter of the student, guardian, encourager and facilitator. This multi faceted role may seem dichotomous, however is highly essential. For the teacher has to segregate students based on their abilities thereby to some she is the mentor, while to others a guardian or a facilitator based on the reading needs of the student. This ability comes about through understanding of social constructivism which provides an understanding of a learner as an individual with a distinct identity and needs.

To what extent was the First World War Essay Example for Free

To what extent was the First World War Essay World war one was not the sole cause of the revolution; it was a trigger that affected the timing of the revolution in 1917 as it exacerbated problems that already existed.   Such problems were limited constitutional change, the shortcomings of Stolypin’s reforms, and the negative side affects of industrialisation, mass protest and the limitations of Tsar Nicholas II. Paragraph 1 – Limited constitutional change   The Tsar continued to reinstate his autocratic rule by ignoring his people’s desires, such as the upper class and lower class, and promising to reform but progressed with minimal improvement. Limited constitutional change caused the Russian people to become distrusting of the Tsar and resort to a revolution to change the government’s policies themselves in order for Russia to become a more democratic state. An example of limited constitutional change is the October manifesto that was introduced on the 30th of October 1905, prompted by the 1905 revolution Bloody Sunday.   The working class and peasants had appealed to the Tsar concerning his superannuated form of government. Requesting for a share in representative government along with improved working conditions.   The October manifesto produced addressed these concerns, with a promise of free citizenship and no rule to be passed without the agreement of a state duma   However, despite the Duma being permitted to exist, their powers were restricted to such a great extent that the Duma didn’t have any significant impact upon the government. Nicholas did this by issuing a set of Fundamental laws on the 23rd of April 1906, the eve of the opening of the first Duma. The Fundamental laws only reinforced the Tsar’s autocratic power and disengaged any potential government reform of Parliament by seizing its power.   Nicholas’s half hearted idea of reform was not intended to satisfy the people’s desire for a share in representative government but to only safeguard his position as Tsar.   This started to become evident to the people when the third Duma (1907-1912) was more conservative as the Tsar had replaced members who seemed critical of his government.   The third Duma consisted of only 45 seats for the kadels. The First World War put strain on the constitution as Russia required an efficient government organisation, however the Tsar wouldn’t allow anyone to share his power thus resulting in a narrow-minded form of government that couldn’t meet the demands of war.   Additionally, the changes to the election laws were unrealistically high. This was yet another example of Nicholas trying to safeguard his position as Tsar as he thought repression would stop any opposition influencing his people in terms of democracy. However, it was already becoming clear to the people that autocracy was no longer suitable for the beginning of the 19th century as modernisation of industry required a modernisation of government. * Limited constitutional change was down to the Tsar’s inability to reform because of his stubborn personality. The First World War did not create these problems, as they already existed before 1914. Such an example would be Bloody Sunday. The liberal gentry also wanted more power given to the zemstva, as they were worried that if the Tsar didn’t share power, a revolution would take place. The 1917 march revolution was the revolution they were apprehensive for. The Shortcomings of Stolypin’s reforms   The Tsar’s insistence of receiving little help with the ruling of Russia allowed scarcely any reform to take place as the Tsar was not fully aware, or didn’t intend to be, with the problems that needed addressing, such as peasant farming.   This resulted with Stolypin introducing a land reform degree in November 1906.   Peasants were allowed to leave the commune freely, have a right to own their own land and consolidate strips. However, one of the downfalls of these reforms was that they were not compulsory.   The war put a lot of pressure on Russia’s agricultural production as it was their main export and so underinvestment in agriculture meant that the war exacerbated problems that already existed, such as the redistribution of land held by the nobility. This was one of the key issues that hadn’t been addressed by Stolypin, along with backward farming methods, lack of preserving land through not using fertiliser and high direct and indirect tax. By 1913 productivity rose by 1% per year with a record of 70 million ton harvest in 1913, however yields were still low compared to other countries.   25% of peasants made no change while 66% of peasants decided to own land privately, although by 1917 95% of peasants returned to the Mir. Despite the government’s intent to give the peasants some financial support by setting up a land bank between 1906 and 1913, most peasants were unable to afford the debt due to the expensive taxes. Redemption payments were abolished by 1917 and peasant purchasing power increased by 15% but there was still no change to the high direct and indirect tax. Land prices sore and produce prices fell. This left peasants in an all too familiar financial detriment, giving them more reason to revolt for improved living conditions as the first world war demanded produce by which they had no efficient methods to meet. The negative social affects of industrialisation   As the peasants were released from the Mir, they were able to work and live in towns benefitting industry. Nonetheless, there were negative social affects of industrialisation as by 1914 two fifths of factory workers were in factories with over 1000 members. Their average wages were below the ptiful of 1904 therefore workers began to protest about wages and went on strike in 1912 in the Lena goldfields where 170 were killed.   Development in industry from 1906-1914 with 8% per annum was beneficial for Russia, however Russia began from a low starting point and so it was easier to achieve large percentage increase at the expense of Russia’s working class. Workers in towns that were used to the quiet countrysides were more susceptible to opposition propaganda. Workers were an important part of the industrial boom as they contributed to the efficiency of factories. As their masses increased, it was more likely strikes would occur because of the poor, unhygienic, dangerous living and working conditions they were forced to live in.   Great masses in cramped spaces in towns also led to an increase in tension between them, raising the chance that the masses would join together and form a revolution to get the government to notice their propositions. The First World War demanded more military equipment and put pressure on working factories. Russia’s poor economic institution meant that the impact of war was too large a strain upon it and upon the working class. This lead to a revolution because laboring Russians wanted better lives and working conditions but the Tsar continued to ignore them. Growth of mass protest   As more workers revolted, so did the growth of mass protest.   The government used repression in order to solve this, in 1906 stolypin’s necktie was introduced. And the Okhrana were still intrusive and demanded passports on the spot. Despite freedom of press, in 1905 newspapers were still censored. World war one put the regime to new tests as repression was only a short term solution. In 1909, employers ignored the concessions of 1905 and the lack of the Tsar’s involvement meant the Duma intervened in 1912 producing an insurance scheme establishing protection for workers   Although order and control were issued through the Okhrana and repression using stolypin’s necktie, this only partially stabilized the regime. The war required an organised, efficient government, which Nicholas was not providing. Food distribution and army equipment were not being delivered efficiently, causing revolts in response. It was clear that repression wouldn’t last long, especially when the Tsar left his position to become commander in chief in 1915, leaving Russia without a Tsar. This would lead to a revolution because an unstable government wouldn’t survive the pressures of the war and its demands, therefore people would rebel. Limitations of Nicholas II   Nicholas often made bad decisions, despite his good intentions making him a poor leader. In 1915 he took control of the Russian army. He became the spotlight for criticism of deaths and shortage of ammunition, poor equipment and the shortage of boots.   People asked for consultative assembly however Nicholas had betrayed his people by issuing a set of Fundamental laws. This was because he had a weak character and was intimidated by criticism, so he didn’t allow it.   Poor leadership and incompetent communication among the leaders meant instructions were not followed carefully or not at all. Nicholas was personally responsible for Russia’s performance in the war.

US Executive Branch of Government

US Executive Branch of Government The executive branch of government is that branch with exclusive power and responsibility for the everyday administration of the country. This branch implements the law. The distribution of power into different branches of government is fundamental to the initiative of division of power. In some parts of the world (countries) the term executive refers to the government. Though, this practice fails to make a distinction between authoritarian and autonomous structure of the government. In the despotic systems (autocracy or complete dominion) where the diverse powers of government are unsaid by one person (small oligarchy) the executive branch stops to subsist in view of the fact that there is no other branch with which to divide up separate but equivalent governmental powers. The division of powers system is premeditated to allocate authority away from the executive branch. This is an effort to protect individual autonomy in reply to autocratic leadership throughout history. The execut ive officer is not hypothetical to create laws or construe them. Their chief role is to put into effect the laws as printed by the legislative branch (legislature) and construed by the judicial branch. The head of this branch is President of United States of America. This branch also comprises of many departments (sub departments) and agencies. Explanation: Bureaucracy in United States refers to the executive branch of government. The congress has it own bureaucracy, bureaucratic personnel that makes their budgets etc. The executive branch of United States consists of agencies and departments that receive inclinations from the President. The President (principal bureaucrat) is the directorial chief of executive branch. The lack of precise, exhaustive words in the Constitution unfolding the influence and responsibilities of the executive branch has specified President of United States an immense deal of suppleness to enhance its dimension and capacity over the years. This flexibility is in stipulations of both the assortment of its power and the amount of departments and agencies engaged to achieve its tasks. The division of executive branch (bureaucracies) is: The president The vice president Fifteen Cabinet rank executive departments. The President: President is chosen every four years, and decides his/her vice president as a administration companion. The president is also serves as the commander-in-chief of the U.S. Armed Forces and is for all intents and purposes the person in charge of the country. Once in a year the President must convey a State of the Union address to Congress, He may propose legislation to Congress, he may assemble Congress. He also has the power to hire ambassadors to other countries. He has the power to select justices of Supreme Court and other federal judges. To execute and put into effect the laws of the United States he is expected with his Cabinet and other agencies. The vice president: The Vice President is chosen together with the President by the Electoral College. The person who receives the highest votes become the President and the second highest vote taker becomes the vice president in United States. The most important responsibility of the Vice President is to be prepared at a moments notice to presume the administration if the President is powerless to carry out his duties (death, resignation etc of the President). The vice president is also act as the president of senate of United States. He/she has the authority to give the vote (deciding vote) when there is a tie. Vice President hardly ever in fact be in charge of over the Senate as a substitute, the Senate choose one of their personal members to preside over the Senate each day. The Cabinet: It is a consultative body comprise of the heads of the 15 executive departments. Who are selected by the President and approved by the Senate. The members of the Cabinet are often the Presidents closest sounding board. In addition to the administration of key federal agencies, they have a significant part in the Presidential line of succession (after the Vice President, Speaker of the House, and Senate President pro tempore). All the constituent of the Cabinet receive the designation Secretary, excluding the chief of the Justice Department, who is designated as Attorney General. Clientele agencies: Department of Agriculture: The agriculture department of United States builds up and carries out guiding principles on farming, agriculture, and food. The plan of this department incorporates meeting the requirements of farmers, endorse agricultural manufacturing and its trade, guarantee safety of food, shielding natural resources, development of rural population, and finish starvation in United States and in foreign countries. Department of Commerce: This department acts as governmental bureau with the responsibilities of civilizing living standards for all the citizens of United States. This is done by encouraging economic growth and innovations in technology. This department helps the business and industry sector of US by assembling economic and demographic statistics, issuing exclusive rights and trademark, and makes sure of the effectual utilization of methodical and practical assets. It also prepares telecommunications and technology strategy, and maintains exports of United States by supporting and implementing international trade agreements. Department of the Interior: This department is United States major preservation bureau. Its task is to guard nationà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s natural resources, recommend amusement occasion, carry out scientific explorations, preserve and look after fish and wildlife, and respects our sincerity to American Indians, Alaskan Natives, and our farm duties to island areas. Department of Labor: This department manages federal agenda for ensuring a well-built US workforce. Duty this department is to cultivate and support the wellbeing of the unemployed, wage takers, and those who are retired by standardizing their working environment, provide prospect for beneficial employment, providing health care and retirement benefits, help the manager to find personnel, escalating free cooperative negotiations, and follow alteration in employment, prices, and other nationalized economic dimensions. Union maintenance agencies: Department of states: This department is engaged in maintain and executing the foreign policy of President. Image of US in foreign countries, military education program for other countries, resist international misdeeds, and a large collection of services to American resident and people from other countries looking for entry to the U.S. Department of treasury: This department promotes economic wealth and guarantees the reliability and safety of the United States and global monetary structure. Department of Justice: This department implements the law and protects the welfare of America related to law. It provides protection against intimidation of alien and domestic bodies. It supports the federal agencies to stop the crimes and penalize those who are involved in unlawful practices. Department of Defense: This department grants armed forces to dissuade war and to guard the safety of United States. Regulatory agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Transportation, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Energy Redistribution agencies: This agency deals with the circulation of money in the county like Federal Reserve System, monetary policy, fiscal policy etc. The iron triangle: The todays US government forms a triangle in which all the interest groups, committees of Congress and bureaucratic agencies work together. In the essence of this theory the departments and agencies maintain close acquaintances with interest group who desire to persuade their procedures. They may give important information to government agencies, and they are provoked to include their opinion listened. The interest groups and administrator get in touch with congress committees and sub committees that form the laws that oversee their interests. Most governmental policies are set when these parties work together. Problem of bureaucratic control: The Bureaucrats have their personal aspirations and inspirations. There is a principal agent relationship between bureaucrats ant their agencies like they are dependent on two mechanisms (before and after the fact), the meetings procedures and bureaucratic authorities (before the fact) and encouragement given for achievement or suspended for nonperformance of a meticulous assignment (after the fact). These methods must be engaged to limit the option of bureaucratic drift in which the bureaucracy might create strategy more to its predilection than to the novel purpose of the commanding strategy creator. The president can lead bureaucratic agencies. Congress can encourage liable bureaucracy in the course of failure to notice and the exploitation and preservation of incentives. Public hearing is one instrument of Congress to supervise bureaucratic actions. In conditions, Congress can also have power over the bureaucracy by redrafting the legislation and changing appropriations. How to reduce bureaucracy: Regardless of the suspicions that the bureaucracy is rising uncontrollable, the federal government has scarcely developed in any way in the last 30 years. Even then many United States citizens squabble that government is too huge and ought to be condensed. The majority general efforts to decrease the bureaucracy consist of termination (the absolute removal of governmental programs and the agencies that manage them like deregulation), privatization (shifting an agenda from public sector to private sector) and devolution (Decline in bureaucracy can also be attained in the course of devolution. This means the hard work to rationalize the federal bureaucracy by hand over the policy execution to state and local governments). The post-9/11 demands of domestic safety contain misrepresented the political power of bureaucratic restructuring as general public and officeholders have come to believe that thought that the federal government will cultivate to guarantee the security of people of Un ited States. Conclusion: The executive branch has undergone incredible modifications over the years, assembly it very unusual from what it was under George Washington. Todays executive branch is much superior, extra multifaceted, and more influential than it was when the United States was established.

Immigraton Laws Essay -- essays research papers fc

Immigraton Laws The first immigrants to the territory now the United States were from Western Europe. The first great migration began early in the 19th century when large numbers of Europeans left their homelands to escape the economic hardships resulting from the transformation of industry by the factory system and the simultaneous shift from small-scale to large-scale farming. At the same time, conflict, political oppression, and religious persecution caused a great many Europeans to seek freedom and security in the U.S. The century following 1820 may be divided into three periods of immigration to the U.S. During the first period, from 1820 to 1860, most of the immigrants came from Great Britain, Ireland, and western Germany. In the second period, from 1860 to 1890, those countries continued to supply a majority of the immigrants; the Scandinavian nations provided a substantial minority. Afterwards the proportion of immigrants from northern and Western Europe declined rapidly. In the final period, from 1890 to 1910, fewer than one-third of the immigrants came from these areas. The majority of the immigrants were natives of Southern and Eastern Europe, with immigrants from Austria, Hungary, Italy, and Russia constituting more than half of the total. Until World War I, immigration had generally increased in volume every year. From 1905 to 1914 an average of more than a million immigrants entered the U.S. every year. With the start of the war, the volume declined sharply, and the annual average from 1915 to 1918 was little more than 250,000. In 1921 the number again rose; 800,000 immigrants were admitted. Thereafter the number declined in response to new conditions in Europe and to the limitations established by U.S. law. The first measure restricting immigration enacted by Congress was a law in 1862 banning American vessels from transporting Chinese immigrants to the U.S.; 20 years later Congress passed the Chinese Exclusion Act excluding Chinese immigrants.(Immigration) In 1875, 1882, and 1892, acts passed by Congress provided for the examination of immigrants and for the exclusion from the U.S. of convicts, polygamists, prostitutes, persons suffering from contagious diseases, and persons liable to become public charges. The Alien Contract Labor Laws of 1885, 1887, 1888, and 1891 prohibited the immigration to the U.S. of persons entering the country t... ...ion (Rumbaut, 617). Despite evidence to the contrary, many Americans still believe immigration to be harmful. This is simply not the case. As stated, legal immigrants provide a benefit not only to themselves, but also to native people. Though the problem of illegal immigration must be addressed, it should be done in such a way as not to discourage legal immigration. America was founded and populated by people from other countries. We must continue this if we expect to survive in the 21st century. BIBLIOGRAPHY Blotnick, Srully. "Unleashed (Immigrant Professionals)." Forbes 26 Jan. 1987: 108. Mandel, Michael J. "The Immigrants: How They are Helping to Revitalize the U.S. Economy." Business Week 13 July 1992: 114-18. "Immigration," Microsoft (R) Encarta. Copyright (c) 1994 Microsoft Corporation. Copyright (c) 1994 Funk & Wagnall's Corporation. "Pending Legislation", www.usbc.org/surveys/npg-poll.htm Rumbaut, Ruben, "Origins and Destinies: Immigration to the United States since World War II," Sociological Forum 9:4 (1994), pp. 583-621. "The New Americans: Yes, They'll Fit in too." The Economist 11 May 1991: 17-20.

Management, Organisations and People Module Report Essay

Introduction: The aim of this report is to provide an explanation to ‘Mimi Vasquez Hair and Beauty’ managers’ approach to leadership and go on to explore his relationship to his work group and how they have developed over time. It will first outline the methodology used to conduct this report and then go on to introduce the managers and workers and explain how their current work roles have developed over time. Subsequently, the report will provide an explanation to ‘Mimi Vasquez Hair and Beauty’ managers’ approach to leadership and go on to explore his relationship to his work group. To conclude the report, there will be a quick summary of what has already been mentioned and some limitations of the findings, methodology and related theories used in the report. The beauty salon which was named after its manager is privately owned and located in Chiswick in West London. In addition, it has two other branches located in Ealing and Hammersmith, both also within the West London area and owned by the same manager. All three of the beauty salons are relatively small in size making satisfactory profits and located just off the high streets in quieter areas. The first branch was opened in 1999 in Chiswick and the others followed on 5 years later, the Hammersmith branch being the newest. Method This report was conducted using both primary and secondary research. The primary research was collected directly from the manager and team members by interviewing them. By so doing, the research collected was new and wasn’t research that had already existed. Secondary research was collected through the use of books, the internet and articles and hence looking at existing data. Findings and discussion Behavioural theory As the manager, Mimi Vasquez, supervises and manages the overall performance of his staff and the business. His current work role is to analyse and recommend developing strategies on how to improve the quality of their services e.g. more speed and efficiency in cutting hair and accuracy with mixing colours of hair dye. These two examples are some of Mimi’s main targets and he wishes to have met these goals by July 2011. Mimi also examines ways to achieve his business goals of maximising profits and acknowledges that compensations and rewards have worked well in the past as they motivate and encourage staff to work better: Every year he elects 2 people as the most improved and most enthusiastic team members and rewards them in the form of bonuses and HMV vouchers. His work role also involves instructing his team members and allocating them to different parts of the salon when the day gets busy Moreover, this has played a great role in the development of Mimi’s leadership within the business. Yukl (2006, p5) defines leadership as- Leadership is the process wherein an individual member of a group or organization influences the interpretation of events, the choice of objectives and strategies, the organization of work activities, the motivation of people to achieve the objectives, the maintenance of cooperative relationships, the development of skills and confidence by member, and the enlistment of support and cooperation from people outside the group or organisation. Yukl’s definition very closely matches Mimi’s approach to leadership in the sense that it emphasizes the importance of ‘people skills’ and the social influence that leadership can have. One theory to provide evidence for this is the behaviour perspective. This theory claims that people become leaders because of what they do and this can be split into two different categories: task behaviour and relationship behaviour. Task behaviour places the main focus on the degree to which a leader emphasises productivity targets, goal accomplishments and maintaining standards. These behaviours can also be called ‘production-centred’ and it can be seen in Mimi’s leadership style when he uses HMV vouchers to motivate his staff to work harder and faster. Mimi has also said that rewards gave his staff an incentive to work and this played a crucial part in keeping them happy and full of energy, even towards the end of the day. Furthermore, relationship behaviour focuses on manager’s actions that show concern for their staff and their welfare as opposed to behaviours that concentrate on completing tasks. Although this contrasts to task behaviour, this can also be seen in Mimi’s leadership approach in the sense that he aims to improve his staff’s skills and help them gain more confidence in their job role. Trait perspective The controversy in defining leadership has enabled many different theories to be developed in an attempt to explain the meaning of a leader within a business or an organisation. Bratton (2010, p363) cited that ‘individuals who occupy leadership positions possess superior qualities or attributes compared with the traits possessed by non- leaders’. This view is known as the trait perspective and its’ theories such as the ‘great man theories’ focus mostly on positive characteristics such as stamina, intelligence and fluency in speech. Research in 1974 by Stogdill showed that socioeconomic factors also played a great role for example, very few corporate leaders had fathers who held a low class position or who were paid quite poorly. Stogdill also found that intelligence and fluency in speech were very closely related to leadership and used these traits to differentiate leaders from followers. He then concluded that there were ‘specific patterns’ of traits that occurred in some people which gave them an advantage when seeking a leadership position. Shabina and Mario also described their manager to hold very positive characteristics such as friendly, talkative, enthusiastic and organised and wasn’t like the other staff members at ‘Mimi Vasquez hair and beauty’ in the sense that he was much more determined. This therefore justifies why Mimi is a leader. In addition, research into ‘substitute’s for leadership’ claim that there should be a distinct difference between the leader and the followers in a business and there should be inflexible rules and formalized areas of responsibility in order to prevent the followers from being guided by their peers and replacing their existing leader. This would occur if the followers realized that their peers had the skills equivalent to their leader and they decided to follow them instead. Keith Grint (2005) also argues that successful leadership- Is not a list of innate skills and competences, or how much charisma you have, or whether you have a vision or a strategy for achieving that vision, but whether you have a capacity to learn from your followers. This again, provides evidence against the trait perspective stating that this is not what makes an effective leader. The shared/super leadership theory The founding of Mimi’s other branches, helped him gain experience which developed his role even further as he had to identify problems, make choices and provide alternatives actions to his initial plans. His role development throughout the years has been quite significant and his responsibilities have duplicated allowing him to improve his time management and organisation. Mario and Shabina are two team members of the salon who were also interviewed. Mario is a professional hair stylist whose work role involves restyling and cutting clients’ hair, dying, permanent hair straightening, Brazilian hair blow drying etc. His work role is crucial to the business as he has qualities and skills that require a lot of training and experience in order to gain. Mario’s work role has developed over the years as his experience has allowed him to move up the ladder in regards to the styles and haircuts he can confidently perform. The number of clients he reserves on a daily basis has also increased over the past 6 years of working at the salon showing an improvement in his abilities. He is now responsible for his own clients as before he would only deal with Mimi’s clients and help around. However, he is still in a lower position to Mimi and is usually responsible for making sure that Mimi’s clients are booked in for the dates and times they requested, making sure none of the time slots clash with one another. The Shared/super leadership theory suggests that excellent leaders are those who help their followers develop by acting as their teacher rather than keeping all of their knowledge to themselves. To add, Peter Senge(1990) also stated that ‘leaders are designers, stewards and teachers’ which supports the view. Mimi has constantly trained his team members, in particularly Mario and this also adds towards the statement that Mimi is an effective leadership. Fiedler’s leadership contingency theory Shabina is the only beautician at ‘Mimi Vasquez Hair and Beauty’ and her role involves taking care of her own customers and making her own bookings as well as offering all of the services; waxing, laser hair removal, threading, massages etc. Her role doesn’t involve anything to do with hair, and she works in her own room downstairs. However, Mimi is her manager also and so it is her responsibility to follow all of his guidelines and instructions. Her role has developed over the past 3 years as she first started out as an assistant, cleaning around and helping the beautician. She then worked her way up by gaining experience and qualifications and developed her role into a full-time professional beautician. Fiedler’s leadership contingency theory proposes that the effectiveness of the leader depends on whether the leadership style is matched with the followers and the environment. It is based on 3 main assumptions: 1) leader-member relations, which relate to whether the leader receives support, respect and trust of the followers; 2) task structure, which relates to how structured the tasks performed by followers are; 3) position power, which relates to the formal authority that the leader can exert through the use of punishment and rewards. This theory can explain Mimi’s leadership style as it explains why Mimi’s leadership is effective and hence how he has been able to successfully run the business for so many years. In relation to this theory, Mimi is placed to be known as a relationship-orientated leader and so it explains that his team members have been able to develop throughout the years because of his concern for them. The situational leadership theory Mimi’s relationship to his group is fairly hierarchical where he would force influence upon others to do something that they otherwise wouldn’t. This hair and beauty business is a good example as it shows how Mario takes responsibility for making bookings for both, his and Mimi’s clients. The group itself had developed over the years as they have slowly started to work as a team, helping each other and finishing each other’s jobs off when the salon gets busy. In 1999, manager Mimi’s Vasquez’s main roles were to simply open and close the salon, receive payments for the service provided and order raw materials such as; hair dye, scissors, wax etc. Now, with the growth of the business, all of the team members in the salon have developed their roles as they have had to cover for each other and enhance coordination skills. The situational leadership model is where the leaders’ leadership style depends on the maturity of the followers; it can explain that why Mimi trusts his staff to look after his salon whilst he is in a different branch. The friendly nature of the business also allows Mimi to be less formal and more flexible with rules and procedures. Bratton (2010, p.370) states that ‘Follower maturity is determined by the ability and willingness of the followers to accept responsibility for completing their work’. The fact that each team member has their own set of responsibilities proves that their levels of maturity are very high and hence can explain why Mimi’s rules are quite flexible, according to Mario and Shabina. Conclusion The report has explored Mimi’s approach to leadership using the behavioural, trait, shared/super leadership, contingency and situational theories and it can clearly be seen that leadership is not easily defined and its effectiveness isn’t easily measured. It has also outlined the work roles of the manager as well as the team members and explained how their roles have developed. To conclude, although the report gives a sense of idea of what Mimi’s leadership approach may be, in reality it is very hard to accurately describe using only one theory. Appendix Bratton, J. (2010) Work and organisational behaviour. 2nd edn, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan Grint,K.(2005) Leadership: limits and possibilities, Basingstoke: Palgrave Senge, P.M.(1990) The Fifth Discipline. New York: Currency/Doubleday Yukl, G.(2006) Leadership in organizations.6th edn, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall

Joesph Plum Martin Narrative of a Revolutionary Soldier

Revolutionary Soldier During Joseph Martin journey in the revolution war he found himself not agreeing with many of the things the other soldiers were used to doing. The other soldiers were used to always getting what they wanted, when they wanted it. In order to do this, whenever they needed something, such as food they would just barge into nearby homes and demand for what they wanted. Most home owners knew that if they didn't do what the soldiers asked, that things would go very bad quickly. Meaning a large amount of the home owners would just be friendly and give the soldiers what they wanted just to keep the peace.Also some of the home owners enjoyed getting a visit from the soldiers because it made them fell wanted and thankfully to help support a fellow soldier. Martin didn't have the same view as many of the soldiers did on this certain activity. Well he was involved with doing that activity he would feel guilty and wanted to apologize to the family because he didn’t t hink they deserved such a thing. He didn’t enjoy doing it because he believed it was rude and that they were abusing their power of authority. Before he went to war he learned right from wrong and would never imagine doing such a thing to innocent citizens in the area.The only reason that he would participate in this activity was because Soldiers during the war had been doing it prior to when he entered the war and he didn't want to deal with all the others soldiers by telling them his real opinion on it. Also he needed the items the other soldiers were asking for as well but just wanted there to be another way for them to get it. Even though he didn't agree with many of the things he had to do while he was gone at war, going into other people's home uninvited was the thing he disagreed with the most. Even thought he was there for many days, they were a few days that he remembered quite well.One day he remembered was when he was just relaxing at the cabin he was staying at wi th some fellow soldiers, when two lovely women come over to talk to them. They had a great conversion with the ladies, and the ladies ended up inviting them over to their place to visit more. Soon after arriving at the ladies place, the ladies expressed to the soldiers that their closest neighbors weren't very respectful to them. † when the mother observed that it had been quite cross and crying all Martin, â€Å"I have been threatening,† said she, â€Å"to give her to the Yankees. â€Å"Take care,† said the wagoner, â€Å"how you speak of the Yankees, I have one of them here with me. † â€Å"La! † said the woman, â€Å"is he a Yankee? I thought he was a Pennsylvanian;—I I don’t see any difference between him and other people†. The men didn't like that because they believed that all women should be treated with respect. As the soldiers they were, they decided to all march over to the ladies neighbors and demand for food in a vi olent way. At first when the soldiers arrived the man who opened the door wanted to put up a fight and not let the soldiers demand for items they needed just because for who they were.Soon after the man realized he wasn't going to win the fight he let the soldiers come inside his house and told his wife to make some bread. Everything turned out fine, the soldiers got what they wanted and the neighbors didn't get hurt. Although Martin wished they would of aproshed the situation differently and more safely. In most situation Martin at least understand why the soldiers would go to ransoms people house, it was because they had something they needed. But one day was different and Martin really didn't agree with the other soldiers. but when we came to their stables, then look out for the women; take what horse you would, it was one or the others â€Å"pony† and they had no other to ride to church; and when we had got possession of a horse we were sure to have half a dozen or more w omen pressing upon us, until by some means or other, if possible, they would slip the bridle from the horse’s head, and then we might catch him again if we could† On this day they soldiers decided to go into the local village in order to get some items they needed.Well at least that is what Martin thought. After they got there the soldiers were crazy and were taking everything they could even if they didn’t need it in the first place. Like the good man he was, Martin turned out only taking the necessary items he personal needed. By doing that it left the village a mess and all the villagers scared and upset. Also making Martin very unpleased with his fellow soldiers. Even though Martin didn't agree with making innocent citizens in the area give them what they wanted or else.Or messing up a village for items they needed along with unnecessary items. Martin decided early on during this war experience that he was just going to go with the flow of what everyone else was doing. That way he doesn't had to end up telling the soldiers his opinion and deal with any conflict there may be with it. He was afraid of the superiors reaction to what he thought and he didn’t want to be punished for his thoughts.Even though his biggest trouble during the war was taking items from innocent citizens, there were many other circumstances that troubled him as well such as the conditions that he had to work under where horrible and they contributed to many people getting sick. â€Å"I had the small pox favorably as did the rest, generally; we lost none; but it was more by good luck, or rather a kind Providence interfering, than by my good conduct that I escaped with life. † They marched and marched and they would push their bodies to the limit.They fought under tough conditions and through the winter without a reliable way to get warm. Joseph Really did not like this at all he wanted to be warm and be able to stay healthy. Throughout this book Martin had many views on the revolutionary war. Most of them were negative such as he didn’t like taking supplies from the villages. The conditions of the war were really rough and he ended up getting small pox from that. He nearly lost his life from the small pox.His view before he entered the war and his view after were completely different. The war changed him and his view on the whole thing. ——————————————– [ 1 ]. Martin, Joesph P. A Narrative of a Revolutionary Soldier. USA: First Signet Classics Printing, 2001. Print. Ch4 [ 2 ]. Martin, Joesph P. A Narrative of a Revolutionary Soldier. USA: First Signet Classics Printing, 2001. Print. Ch4 [ 3 ]. Martin, Joesph P. A Narrative of a Revolutionary Soldier. USA: First Signet Classics Printing, 2001. Print. Ch 3